Joshua N Pritikin wrote:
Ick. That's probably a bug. What I'm going to do is just drop any
pending signals when you can stop(). Will that work for you?
Interesting. -stop is actually documented to cancel pending events;
I hadn't noticed that before. So that change does seem to be necessary,
On Thu, Apr 22, 2004 at 08:36:07AM +0100, Zefram wrote:
And a final thought before I head off on holiday: consider the event
sequence
0. start a signal watcher
1. receive a signal
2. start a second watcher for the same signal
3. send another signal
4. process events
At the moment, both
