playing nicely with signal handlers

2004-04-19 Thread Zefram
, I'd like commentary from the list. -zefram

fix for incomplete documentation

2004-04-21 Thread Zefram
this watcher +has any events pending in the event queue. In array context, returns +a list of all the watcher's pending events. =back -zefram

Re: manually-invoked watchers

2004-04-21 Thread Zefram
watcher for which the poll attribute has not been specified. -zefram

pending signal events

2004-04-21 Thread Zefram
. (wishlist) a cancel method on event objects would be nice And now you get some respite from me, because I'm going on holiday tomorrow. Back Monday evening (UK time). -zefram

Re: pending signal events

2004-04-22 Thread Zefram
in the event queue. If they are consistently treated as if they were, then promoting them to event objects is invisible from the point of view of the documented interface. It's exactly that invisibility that would be achieved by making -pending perform promotions. -zefram

Re: pending signal events

2004-04-26 Thread Zefram
() sweep() will execute event handlers, will it not? I don't want to do that. -zefram

Re: pending signal events

2004-04-29 Thread Zefram
be an option on -pending, -start, one_event, sweep, and loop, to say don't bother checking for async events; it should also be possible to invoke asynccheck explicitly. -zefram

Re: PATCH: generic watchers with dataful events

2004-12-08 Thread Zefram
Joshua N Pritikin wrote: OK, can you provide a test script for generic watchers? #!./perl -w use Test; plan test = 10; use Event; require Event::generic; my $src = Event::generic::Source-new; ok $src; my $w0 = Event-generic(parked = 1); ok $w0; eval { $w0-source(undef); }; ok $@, ; eval {

Re: [EMAIL PROTECTED]: Re: Change 31130: [PATCH] FETCH/STORE/LENGTH callbacks for numbered capture variables]

2007-05-09 Thread Zefram
Joshua N Pritikin wrote: Can somebody suggest some other read-only variable or should I just disable the test? $$ $] $^V Not many that are really guaranteed to remain read-only, are there. -zefram

Re: [RESEND] FETCH/STORE/LENGTH callbacks for numbered capture variables

2007-05-19 Thread Zefram
Joshua N Pritikin wrote: I don't think this message reached the mailing list? It did. I received it the first time, and I replied: $$ $] $^V Not many that are really guaranteed to remain read-only, are there. -zefram