RFC 11 (v1) Examples encoded with =also for|begin|en

2000-08-02 Thread Perl6 RFC Librarian
=head1 TITLE Examples encoded with =also for|begin|end POD commands =head1 VERSION Maintainer: Barrie Slaymaker <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Date: 02 Aug 2000 Version: 1 Mailing List: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Number: 11 =head1 ABSTRACT I. The C<=also for|begin|end> commands are shorthand having tw

Re: [p5pod] [RFC ??, v1] =also for|begin|end POD commands

2000-08-02 Thread Brad Appleton
On Wed, Aug 02, 2000 at 03:52:15PM -0400, Barrie Slaymaker wrote: > =head1 IMPLEMENTATION > > The C<=also> command is implemented in Pod::Parser in a process > called "=also mangling". Why is this handled in Pod::Parser when =for and =begin/=end aren't presently handled or known to Pod::Parser??

Re: Bug Tracking

2000-08-02 Thread Elaine -HFB- Ashton
Richard Foley [[EMAIL PROTECTED]] quoth: *> *>I also realise there are a number of people who feel everything should be *>handled by ActiveState, or some other current favourite. I don't belive I'm familiar with that particular spin, in fact the opposite. It's like being an SA where the syste

[RFC ??, v1] =also for|begin|end POD commands

2000-08-02 Thread Barrie Slaymaker
[[Nat: how do I get an official sounding RFC number for this?]] Here is a first draft of a new-style RFC for the =also tag. Still to come is the "=for test, Pod::Tests and pod2tests" RFC it refers to. Please keep [EMAIL PROTECTED] in the To: list - Barrie =head1 TITLE =also for|begin|end POD

Re: Bug Tracking

2000-08-02 Thread Tony Payne
> Pros: > [Long and detailed list snipped] Well, now I feel like a jerk for even bringing it up :-). Some questions I still have, though: *) How long until we could have a perl6 database up and functioning? I think it would be wise to capture feature requests in there. *) Will it forward emai

Re: Bug Tracking

2000-08-02 Thread Alan Burlison
Richard Foley wrote: > Hmmm. > For my part I'd like to say that I don't want to continue to work on any of > this unless a consensus is reached that this would be a good idea. I'm > heartily fed up of taking spurious flak, (valid flak is OK :). > It's mega-frustrating to be at the point where it

Re: Bug Tracking

2000-08-02 Thread Richard Foley
"Andreas J. Koenig" wrote: > > Thank you, Richard. Please keep up your humor. And your fine work too. Us Anglo-Sicilians are moderately thick-skinned with rubber feet (we bounce :-) > I see the critical phase of the system is now over and I hope people > will start contributing their ideas by su