Re: Bug Tracking

2000-08-03 Thread Richard Foley
Tony Payne wrote: > > > > *) How long until we could have a perl6 database up and functioning? I Not so long :-) > A product field is probably the cleanest option, but a new database would be > acceptable to me. A product field, it is, then - makes it easier for admins to be on several differen

Re: [p5pod] [RFC ??, v1] =also for|begin|end POD commands

2000-08-03 Thread Marek Rouchal DAT CAD HW Tel 25849
On Thu, 3 Aug 2000, Brad Appleton wrote: BA>Besides, I think there is still need for a Pod::Translator BA>of Pod::Compiler module that uses (or is subclassed from) BA>Pod::Parser to be the *real* base parser that people use (the BA>one that actually knows the commands, just not necessarily BA>the

Re: [p5pod] [RFC ??, v1] =also for|begin|end POD commands

2000-08-03 Thread Brad Appleton
On Thu, Aug 03, 2000 at 10:52:43AM -0400, Barrie Slaymaker wrote: > If we decide that it's Ok to mandate changes to the most common > Pod::Parser based POD processors, I certainly don't mind providing > some subclass of Pod::Parser or some other utility in Pod::ParseUtils. That would be my prefer

Re: [p5pod] [RFC ??, v1] =also for|begin|end POD commands

2000-08-03 Thread Barrie Slaymaker
Brad Appleton wrote: > > On Wed, Aug 02, 2000 at 03:52:15PM -0400, Barrie Slaymaker wrote: > > =head1 IMPLEMENTATION > > > > The C<=also> command is implemented in Pod::Parser in a process > > called "=also mangling". > > Why is this handled in Pod::Parser when =for and =begin/=end > aren't pres

Re: Bug Tracking

2000-08-03 Thread Tony Payne
I've removed p5p from the distribution list, as I suspect that most of the interested parties are already a member of the bugmongers list. > > *) How long until we could have a perl6 database up and functioning? I > > think it would be wise to capture feature requests in there. > It's a bug data

Re: Bug Tracking

2000-08-03 Thread Richard Foley
"Andreas J. Koenig" wrote: > > I'd suggest to workinggroupize and pumkingify the development system. > Well, thia apparently has happened already. You should be the first > pumpking unless you can name a candidate that is willing and able to > take that role. OK, short of any other suggestions, I

Re: Bug Tracking

2000-08-03 Thread Richard Foley
Tony Payne wrote: > > > Pros: > > [Long and detailed list snipped] > > Well, now I feel like a jerk for even bringing it up :-). Nope, that's OK, your turn to get the beer, though? > Some questions I still have, though: > > *) How long until we could have a perl6 database up and functioning?