Re: [p5pod] [RFC ??, v1] =also for|begin|end POD commands

2000-08-05 Thread Brad Appleton
On Sat, Aug 05, 2000 at 06:47:17AM -0400, Barrie Slaymaker wrote: > I call this new class "POD Extractors", FWIW, since they extract portions > of the POD. Take a look at Pod::Select then and make sure you aren't redesigning andything thats already been hashed out there. NOTE that there is a lot

Re: [p5pod] [RFC ??, v1] =also for|begin|end POD commands

2000-08-05 Thread Brad Appleton
On Fri, Aug 04, 2000 at 05:11:31PM -0400, Barrie Slaymaker wrote: > Brad doesn't want it to go in to the main Pod::Parser, I > don't want to have every POD translator maintainer/author > have to implement =also functionality. Those two aren't diametrically opposed you know. The main error in the

Re: [RFC ??, v1] =also for|begin|end POD commands

2000-08-05 Thread Barrie Slaymaker
Russ Allbery wrote: > > Presenting it in > the RFC as part of a testing framework is actually a bit confusing, since > the impact of the primitive is a lot broader. I'll gladly tweak the RFC to be more sensical, for instance by including your =also for abstract example. The testing example was