On Tue, Sep 19, 2000 at 08:09:41PM -0400, Barrie Slaymaker wrote:
>
> The POD features under discussion are testing features. The discussion
> of SAXish vs. DOMish was a tangent only.
>
Good. Then it sounds like POD-SAX vs. POD-DOM is one less issue to
resolve this week.
Z.
Adam Turoff wrote:
>
> My point is (C), this is a discussion about POD tools, and there is no
> need to form a consensus about that. We will have a need for better tools
> over time, and we will most likely get better tools over time.
>From my point of view, the discussion was about how to impl
On Tue, Sep 19, 2000 at 08:33:18AM -0700, Dave Storrs wrote:
> 1) Warnings on by default: Tom C is strongly against this. Response
>seemed generally negative, and there has been no discussion in the
>last 10 days.
I'm also strongly against it, and RFC 16 belongs to me, but in fairness
to
On Tue, Sep 19, 2000 at 12:33:40PM -0700, Dave Storrs wrote:
> On Tue, 19 Sep 2000, Adam Turoff wrote:
> > And I'm not sure this is an issue for perl-qa to resolve. POD Shall
> > Not Change[*] from a markup perspective. Whether the tools
> > change/improve/multiply is not an issue for the Perl6
On Tue, 19 Sep 2000, Adam Turoff wrote:
> On Tue, Sep 19, 2000 at 08:33:18AM -0700, Dave Storrs wrote:
> >
> > OPEN ITEMS:
> > Note: Not all of these have RFCs associated with them. I would simply
> > like to form a list consensus of how we want to address them.
> >
> > 1) Pod parsers:
>
On Tue, Sep 19, 2000 at 08:33:18AM -0700, Dave Storrs wrote:
>
> OPEN ITEMS:
> Note: Not all of these have RFCs associated with them. I would simply
> like to form a list consensus of how we want to address them.
>
> 1) Pod parsers:
> Marek Rouchal and Barry Slaymaker are working on
On Tue, Sep 19, 2000 at 11:53:20AM -0400, Barrie Slaymaker wrote:
> Dave Storrs wrote:
> >
> > Barrie Slaymaker's RFC 11:
> > Examples encoded with =also for|begin|end POD commands
> > which hasn't been updated in 48 days.
> >
> > is everyone comfortable declaring them Fr
Dave Storrs wrote:
>
> Barrie Slaymaker's RFC 11:
> Examples encoded with =also for|begin|end POD commands
> which hasn't been updated in 48 days.
>
> is everyone comfortable declaring them Frozen?
Yup.
- Barrie
Greetings all,
I volunteered to take over the chairship from Michael for the next
two weeks, until the RFC period closes, so I thought I would try to start
wrapping things up. Below is my understanding, based on rereading pretty
much the entire qa archive, of what topics are settled, whi
Greetings all,
Well, as I understand it, we have 11 days to get everything
wrapped up before the RFC period closes. There are three QA RFCs
outstanding:
Barrie Slaymaker's RFC 11:
Examples encoded with =also for|begin|end POD commands
which hasn't been updated i
10 matches
Mail list logo
