In perl.qa, you wrote:
>On Thu, 13 Sep 2001 19:41:39 -0400
>Kirrily 'Skud' Robert <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
>> Anyone know what might cause this? The same reporter also had the same
>> problem with CPAN-Test-Reporter.
>
>His Test::Harness needs upgrade?
Yeah, I guess that'd be it.
K.
--
Ki
On Thu, 13 Sep 2001 19:41:39 -0400
Kirrily 'Skud' Robert <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Anyone know what might cause this? The same reporter also had the same
> problem with CPAN-Test-Reporter.
His Test::Harness needs upgrade?
--
Tatsuhiko Miyagawa <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Anyone know what might cause this? The same reporter also had the same
problem with CPAN-Test-Reporter.
K.
This distribution has been tested as part of the cpan-testers
effort to test as many new uploads to CPAN as possible. See
http://testers.cpan.org/
Please cc any replies to [EMAIL PRO
At work at e-smith, I'm working on an app that sends a lot of email here
and there and everywhere. It would be *really* handy for me to have a
way to test that the email it's sending is right. So this morning in
the shower (where I do all my best thinking) I was considering writing
Test::Mail.
On Thu 13 Sep 2001 06:57, Nathan Torkington <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Brian Wheeler writes:
> > This diff adds jsr_ic and ret to the interpreter. I don't know if my
> > way of returning is legal, and I know there's probably issues with 64
> > bit machines, but it works...and that's the import
Brian Wheeler writes:
> This diff adds jsr_ic and ret to the interpreter. I don't know if my
> way of returning is legal, and I know there's probably issues with 64
> bit machines, but it works...and that's the important part :)
Ok! We definitely need to get some tests into the Parrot tree. W
