In perl.qa, you wrote:
>On Tue, Oct 09, 2001 at 10:10:33PM +0200, Johan Vromans wrote:
>> Michael G Schwern <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
>> > Debian has the beginnings of that. perl-base is the minimum necessary
>> > to have a useful Perl, basically a binary, the perl man page, and a
>> > handful
On Tue, Oct 09, 2001 at 09:25:08PM -0600, chromatic wrote:
> Here's a patch to Test::Tutorial that improves the test names along those
> criteria. It may be worth adding a few lines on good test names.
>
> Maybe it's worth discussing good testing style, too.
Maybe it's worth editing on the Wiki
Our fearless pumpking recently weighed in on test names that assume success.
What he said made a lot of sense. If a test fails, the message looks all
wrong.
That may compel some people to fix the tests or the modules, but it may confuse
more people.
Here's a patch to Test::Tutorial that improve
http://www.pobox.com/~schwern/src/Test-Simple-0.31.tar.gz
Three major new things in this version. I think this should make
everyone happy.
* Test::More::is_deeply()
A deep comparison version of is() with sensible
diagnostics:
use Test::More tests => 1;
$foo = { foo => [1..9] }; $ba
Straight from the pumking's mouth:
- Forwarded message from Jarkko Hietaniemi <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> -
From: Jarkko Hietaniemi <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: 5.8.0 to-do list
The bad news is that it seems that the things on what I consider to
be a todo list are relativ
On Tue, Oct 09, 2001 at 10:10:33PM +0200, Johan Vromans wrote:
> Michael G Schwern <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> > Debian has the beginnings of that. perl-base is the minimum necessary
> > to have a useful Perl, basically a binary, the perl man page, and a
> > handful of critical modules ...
>
>
Michael G Schwern <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> Debian has the beginnings of that. perl-base is the minimum necessary
> to have a useful Perl, basically a binary, the perl man page, and a
> handful of critical modules ...
Wouldn't it be a good idea to try to define packages like these, so
that
On Tue, Oct 09, 2001 at 09:17:06AM -0400, Shane Landrum wrote:
| On Sun, Oct 07, 2001 at 03:30:58PM -0400, Kirrily 'Skud' Robert ([EMAIL PROTECTED])
|wrote:
| > OK, I've been putting off figuring this out for ages, but here it is:
|
|
|
| Another way to accomplish the same thing, that I hacked
On Sun, Oct 07, 2001 at 03:30:58PM -0400, Kirrily 'Skud' Robert ([EMAIL PROTECTED])
wrote:
> OK, I've been putting off figuring this out for ages, but here it is:
Another way to accomplish the same thing, that I hacked up to
test an internal password-protected web gadget:
On Tue, Oct 09, 2001 at 08:59:48AM +0200, Johan Vromans wrote:
> > Debian. ;)
>
> Actually, I was more thinking in terms of delivering perl not in one
> single rpm, but to have one rpm for barebones perl, and rpms for each
> of the individual core modules (or logical sets of core modules).
Debia
10 matches
Mail list logo
