Re: Aborting testsuits

2004-02-23 Thread Adrian Howard
On Monday, February 23, 2004, at 10:46 PM, Andy Lester wrote: Because it is, in Test::More. I've yet to need it. Nobody's given me a patch to implement it. And T::H doesn't recognize anything like that either? From perldoc test::Harness =item B As an emergency measure, a test script can decid

Re: Aborting testsuits

2004-02-23 Thread Andy Lester
> Because it is, in Test::More. I've yet to need it. Nobody's given me a > patch to implement it. And T::H doesn't recognize anything like that either? -- Andy Lester => [EMAIL PROTECTED] => www.petdance.com => AIM:petdance

Re: Aborting testsuits

2004-02-23 Thread Michael G Schwern
On Mon, Feb 23, 2004 at 08:04:14PM +0100, Thomas Klausner wrote: > Is there any reason why BAIL_OUT is marked as unimplemented in the > Test::More docs? Because it is, in Test::More. I've yet to need it. Nobody's given me a patch to implement it. -- Michael G Schwern[EMAIL PROTECTED]

Re: Distributed testing idea

2004-02-23 Thread Michael G Schwern
On Sun, Feb 22, 2004 at 06:36:22AM -0600, Scott Bolte wrote: > On Sun, 22 Feb 2004 01:07:38 -0500, Michael G Schwern wrote: > > > > See above. Yes, ssh is not portable enough. > > Where is the gap? I have OpenSSH on every Unix platform I > use and, with cygwin's help, all the windows

Re: Distributed testing idea

2004-02-23 Thread Michael G Schwern
On Sun, Feb 22, 2004 at 12:35:03PM +, Nick Ing-Simmons wrote: > >See above. Yes, ssh is not portable enough. > > Well runs on Linux/Unix and Win32 has at least a client > so which platforms is VMS the problem? VMS and Windows. While it exists for Windows, it typically isn't a simple command

Re: Aborting testsuits

2004-02-23 Thread David Wheeler
On Feb 23, 2004, at 6:40 AM, Thomas Klausner wrote: Is there a way to abort a whole testsuite? I use control-c. David

Re: Aborting testsuits

2004-02-23 Thread Adrian Howard
No idea :-) Mr Schwern? Adrian On Monday, February 23, 2004, at 07:04 PM, Thomas Klausner wrote: Hi! On Mon, Feb 23, 2004 at 05:01:54PM +, Adrian Howard wrote: On Monday, February 23, 2004, at 02:40 PM, Thomas Klausner wrote: [snip] Is there a way to abort a whole testsuite? [snip] Yup. T

Re: Aborting testsuits

2004-02-23 Thread Thomas Klausner
Hi! On Mon, Feb 23, 2004 at 05:01:54PM +, Adrian Howard wrote: > > On Monday, February 23, 2004, at 02:40 PM, Thomas Klausner wrote: > [snip] > >Is there a way to abort a whole testsuite? > [snip] > > Yup. Take a look at BAILOUT in Test::Builder. Doing: > > Test::More->builder->BAILOU

Re: Aborting testsuits

2004-02-23 Thread Adrian Howard
On Monday, February 23, 2004, at 02:40 PM, Thomas Klausner wrote: [snip] Is there a way to abort a whole testsuite? [snip] Yup. Take a look at BAILOUT in Test::Builder. Doing: Test::More->builder->BAILOUT should stop Test::Harness in its tracks. Adrian

Aborting testsuits

2004-02-23 Thread Thomas Klausner
Hi! I've got a soon-to-be-large testsuite (based on Test::More) that's testing (among other things) a DB. The tests are in various different small files. If there is a problem with the DB, I want the whole testsuite to stop, instead of running a lot of sure-to-fail tests. Is there a way to abort