On Fri, Jul 23, 2004 at 08:41:58AM +0200, James Mastros wrote:
> BTW, I tend to think that modules that require lots of other things
> deserve lower kwalitee...
Because reinventing the wheel is a good thing, right?
Tony
Paul Johnson wrote:
At the moment the focus seems very much on packaging. That's fine, but
it does mean that "correctly" packaged junk looks pretty good. In time,
some more metrics would be good. Some suggestions:
- How do the CPAN testers reports look?
- What does cpanratings think?
- Some a
[EMAIL PROTECTED] (Michael G Schwern) writes:
> Short version: I'm considering dropping the exit code feature from the
> default behavior of Test::Builder and making it something you can turn on
> instead. Does anyone find this feature useful or otherwise wish to
> protest its removal in 0.50?
