-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Moin,
On Tuesday 21 December 2004 18:32, Michael G Schwern wrote:
> On Tue, Dec 21, 2004 at 04:53:18PM +0100, Tels wrote:
> > On Tuesday 21 December 2004 08:53, Michael G Schwern wrote:
> > > I've gotten absolutely no response about Test::Legacy. Is anybody
> >
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Moin,
On Tuesday 21 December 2004 19:35, Michael G Schwern wrote:
> On Tue, Dec 21, 2004 at 06:09:40PM +0100, Tels wrote:
> > Granted, that was what I did before Test::Legacy, which seems to have
> > gone from a wild idea to some working stage while I was not lo
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Moin,
On Tuesday 21 December 2004 08:53, Michael G Schwern wrote:
> I've gotten absolutely no response about Test::Legacy. Is anybody
> using it? Anybody tried migrating old Test.pm based tests with it?
I am converting my old tests directly to Test::More (Tes
On Tue 21 Dec 2004 18:32, Michael G Schwern <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> On Tue, Dec 21, 2004 at 04:53:18PM +0100, Tels wrote:
> > On Tuesday 21 December 2004 08:53, Michael G Schwern wrote:
> > > I've gotten absolutely no response about Test::Legacy. Is anybody
> > > using it? Anybody tried migr
On Tue, Dec 21, 2004 at 06:09:40PM +0100, Tels wrote:
> Granted, that was what I did before Test::Legacy, which seems to have gone
> from a wild idea to some working stage while I was not looking :)
Most of it was written in about an hour and a half late one night with
another hour worth of polish
> But for all Test::Builder based modules you can get the same intent with
> Test::Builder->reset.
yup, I used that for the port away from Test.pm - works like a charm :)
--Geoff
On Tue, Dec 21, 2004 at 12:56:27PM -0500, Geoffrey Young wrote:
> > There's no "I want to add a new test to this test file that uses Test.pm and
> > it would be nice if I could use Test::Foo" case?
>
> I could see this being really good for Apache-Test, which is by default
> Test.pm driven. the t
Michael G Schwern wrote:
> On Tue, Dec 21, 2004 at 04:53:18PM +0100, Tels wrote:
>
>>On Tuesday 21 December 2004 08:53, Michael G Schwern wrote:
>>
>>>I've gotten absolutely no response about Test::Legacy. Is anybody
>>>using it? Anybody tried migrating old Test.pm based tests with it?
>>
>>I
On Tue, Dec 21, 2004 at 04:53:18PM +0100, Tels wrote:
> On Tuesday 21 December 2004 08:53, Michael G Schwern wrote:
> > I've gotten absolutely no response about Test::Legacy. Is anybody
> > using it? Anybody tried migrating old Test.pm based tests with it?
>
> I am converting my old tests direct
