On Thu, Feb 10, 2005 at 03:02:03PM -0800, Ovid wrote:
> I have no problem with this. Is anyone even using THS?
Yes. Everyone who uses Test::Harness.
On Thu, Feb 10, 2005 at 02:49:55PM -0800, chromatic wrote:
> It's a patch to Test::Harness::Straps, the documentation of which
> disclaims backwards compatibility. I'd like it to work on Windows so as
> to avoid people complaining if it doesn't, but I'm just saying that 1) I
> don't feel any parti
Ovid wrote:
> Is anyone even using THS?
/me raises his hand
> If anything, I
> suspect there are a tiny handful of people who have played with it, but
> haven't really used it since it's not as useful as it could be.
I got Apache-Test to run .php scripts in under 10 lines by subclassing
strap
--- chromatic <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> It's a patch to Test::Harness::Straps, the documentation of which
> disclaims backwards compatibility. I'd like it to work on Windows so
> as
> to avoid people complaining if it doesn't, but I'm just saying that
> 1) I
> don't feel any particular guilt ab
On Thu, 2005-02-10 at 17:30 -0500, Michael G Schwern wrote:
> Err, I don't get it.
It's a patch to Test::Harness::Straps, the documentation of which
disclaims backwards compatibility. I'd like it to work on Windows so as
to avoid people complaining if it doesn't, but I'm just saying that 1) I
do
On Thu, Feb 10, 2005 at 01:56:50PM -0800, chromatic wrote:
> On Thu, 2005-02-10 at 16:46 -0500, Michael G Schwern wrote:
>
> > Trouble is STDOUT is parsed while STDERR is not so T::H has to be able
> > to disambiguate them while still displaying them in the correct ordering
> > and not run afoul
On Thu, 2005-02-10 at 16:46 -0500, Michael G Schwern wrote:
> Trouble is STDOUT is parsed while STDERR is not so T::H has to be able
> to disambiguate them while still displaying them in the correct ordering
> and not run afoul of any buffering issues.
I wave the "Nope, the UNbiquitous Test::Har
On Sun, Feb 06, 2005 at 01:46:14PM -0800, chromatic wrote:
> I don't know that that's a problem if you redirect STDERR to the same
> place as STDOUT. Is there any OS where the order of printing is that
> badly nondeterministic? If so, can I wave my hands at its users and
> suggest either upgradin
On Sun, 2005-02-06 at 20:16 -0600, Andy Lester wrote:
> I should NOT have applied that? It's already on my trunk.
Half of it was good. The IPC::Open3 code is probably problematic, so it
should revert.
I really like the diagnostic-parsing code, but it's worth discussing
whether to enable this b
