Re: best practices for returning a "technical failure" page to a web browser?

2005-04-09 Thread Andrew Pimlott
On Tue, Apr 05, 2005 at 01:13:53PM +, Mark Stosberg wrote: > As part of building web applications, I sometimes return a "technical > failure" page to the web browser when something unexpected happens that > seems like the software's fault. > > I'm wondering if it's the right thing to do to re

Re: Probing requirements

2005-04-09 Thread Barbie
From: "Randy W. Sims" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > I didn't like the Probe name too much at first, but it's kinda grown on > me; seems very perlish. I've come to think of Config::* as a place for > static configuration information such as the compiler used to compiler > perl, $Config{cc}. Probe to me im

Re: Probing requirements (was: Re: Some ideas)

2005-04-09 Thread _brian_d_foy
In article <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>, Randy W. Sims <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > Probe::OS - Gather info on the operating system > Probe::Libs > Probe::Progs > Probe::FileSys - maybe incorporate ideas Schwern posted on p5p recently, Perhaps we can put this under a namespace like Config:: ? I imagi