Thanks for the answers.
Robert
On Fri, Aug 05, 2005 at 11:32:45AM -0400, Robert wrote:
> I am creating my first module (finally) and I was told a while ago to
> use Module::Starter. Which I did. I am fine there. When I look at the
> code generated I see that all the POD stuff is inline while I prefer
> to see POD stuff at the en
I just saw that this morning. I have no idea where that email address came
from as that is a real old address. I will have to check my settings when I
get back to work.
Robert
On 8/6/05 6:03 AM, in article [EMAIL PROTECTED], "Tels"
<[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> -BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
* Shlomi Fish wrote:
>It's nice, but I recall that with the same input file, it did not catch some
>problems that the W3C Validator then yelled at. (I don't recall what file it
>was, sorry).
Yes, Tidy won't report many errors, in particular such errors that are
easy to fix or different in HTML/X
On Saturday 06 August 2005 13:41, Bjoern Hoehrmann wrote:
> * Gábor Szabó wrote:
> >Reading the blog of Geoff about the OSCON session
> >http://www.onlamp.com/pub/wlg/7523
> >I just remembered an open issue for me.
> >
> >How do you test if an HTML page is in one of the w3 standards ?
> >There is t
Michael G Schwern wrote:
On Fri, Aug 05, 2005 at 11:32:45AM -0400, Robert wrote:
Is the inline POD the current preferred way?
That really depends on who you ask. Me? I prefer it. Its totally a matter
of style.
Pros:
* Keeps the docs close to the code so you're more likely to keep the d
On Aug 5, 2005, at 10:32 AM, Robert wrote:
Is the inline POD the current preferred way?
It is for me, which is why I wrote it that way.
Damian Conway, in the new book "Perl Best Practices," advocates
against it for a number of reasons, mainly because he doesn't want
order of subs in cod
* Gábor Szabó wrote:
>Reading the blog of Geoff about the OSCON session
>http://www.onlamp.com/pub/wlg/7523
>I just remembered an open issue for me.
>
>How do you test if an HTML page is in one of the w3 standards ?
>There is the w3 validator online at http://validator.w3.org/ but I cannot use
>tha
Reading the blog of Geoff about the OSCON session
http://www.onlamp.com/pub/wlg/7523
I just remembered an open issue for me.
How do you test if an HTML page is in one of the w3 standards ?
There is the w3 validator online at http://validator.w3.org/ but I cannot use
that for my ongoing tests. I ne
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Moin,
robert, you need to work on your reply-to address :)
- -- Forwarded Message --
Subject: failure notice
Date: Saturday 06 August 2005 11:38
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Hi. This is the qmail-send program at relay03.pair
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Moin,
On Friday 05 August 2005 17:32, Robert wrote:
> I am creating my first module (finally) and I was told a while ago to
> use Module::Starter. Which I did. I am fine there. When I look at the
> code generated I see that all the POD stuff is inline while I pr
On Fri, Aug 05, 2005 at 11:32:45AM -0400, Robert wrote:
> Is the inline POD the current preferred way?
That really depends on who you ask. Me? I prefer it. Its totally a matter
of style.
Pros:
* Keeps the docs close to the code so you're more likely to keep the docs up
to date.
* Docs tak
12 matches
Mail list logo
