--- demerphq <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> One idea might be to try using Data::Dump::Streamer for your tests.
> It
> will serialize the lexical context that the subroutine was compiled
> with (including bound anonymous subroutines and their lexical
> context).
>
> A small hack (that i would be ha
Fellow Testers,
I give you Test.Simple 0.20. This latest version of my port of
Test::Simple and Test::Harness to JavaScript now supports pure .js
test scripts in the browser harness. Details and change log here:
http://www.justatheory.com/computers/programming/javascript/
test_simple-0.2
Robert wrote:
I am creating my first module (finally) and I was told a while ago to use
Module::Starter. Which I did. I am fine there. When I look at the code
generated I see that all the POD stuff is inline while I prefer to see POD
stuff at the end. Is the inline POD the current preferred way?
On 8/11/05, Ovid <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> X-Posted to Perlmonks (http://perlmonks.org/index.pl?node_id=483100)
>
> I frequently write code that generates anonymous functions on the fly.
> However, I often want to verify that these functions are correct
> without executing them. To this end, I
