Hi!
On Wed, Sep 07, 2005 at 03:13:31PM +0300, G?bor Szab? wrote:
> On 9/7/05, David Golden <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> >
> > a) all tests are relevant
> > b) all tests matter equally (are equally weighted)
> > c) higher score means higher quality
> >
> > The scores are available in the database
On 9/7/05, David Golden <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> a) all tests are relevant
> b) all tests matter equally (are equally weighted)
> c) higher score means higher quality
>
> The scores are available in the database. There's no reason that someone
> can't use it to generate their own "Qualitee
chromatic wrote:
Some kwalitee metrics are useful in both places and that's fine. I just
wonder if some of PANTS should be more private.
I think much of the problem could be solved by separating the metrics from
the scoring. If CPANTS just gave the results of various tests so I could
look u
