Re: New kwalitee test, has_changes

2005-09-22 Thread Michael Graham
> As I was downloading the newest version of Devel::Cover this morning, I > pondered on the concept of 1 Kwalitee point for coverage >= 80%, and > another for 100%, and how absolutely impossible it would be to set out > to establish these points for all the modules on CPAN. But it would be Good.

[PATCH] Test::Harness and Devel::Cover combine with overloading to cause infinite recursion in Carp.pm

2005-09-22 Thread demerphq
This is a bug report for perl from [EMAIL PROTECTED], generated with the help of perlbug 1.35 running under perl v5.8.6. - [Please enter your report here] Attached is test case that when run under Test::Harness and Devel::Cover will c

Re: New kwalitee test, has_changes

2005-09-22 Thread demerphq
On 9/22/05, Paul Johnson <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > On Wed, Sep 21, 2005 at 04:26:27PM +0200, demerphq wrote: > > > And, it doesnt help that something about DC breaks the defined > > operator when dealing with overloaded objects. (yeah, he did say the > > code was alpha quality :-) > > Bug report

Re: New kwalitee test, has_changes

2005-09-22 Thread Paul Johnson
On Wed, Sep 21, 2005 at 10:28:33PM -0400, James E Keenan wrote: > David Landgren wrote: > >demerphq wrote: > > > > > > >You miss my point. Whether the code be cross-platform or cross-version, > >you need to aggregate the coverage results from all the environments > >your code is designed to run