http://www.pobox.com/~schwern/src/Test-Simple-0.61.tar.gz
or
http://svn.schwern.org/CPAN/Test-Simple/trunk
or
a CPAN mirror near you.
A small raft of small fixes have happened between 0.60 and 0.61 as well
as a few new features.
New Features:
* Test::Builder::Module has been added to help test
On Fri, Sep 23, 2005 at 04:03:32PM -0700, Jan Dubois wrote:
> > Ok, thanks. I'll let you know if I get any tuits to work on it
> > before then.
>
> Maybe I'm missing something, but wouldn't it make sense to use
> Module::ScanDeps for this and put any additional heuristics in
> there?
Module::Scan
On Fri, Sep 23, 2005 at 07:33:04PM +0200, Tels wrote:
> Not yet. Good idea. The relevant code is in parse_file() in gen_graph - it
> gets as option one .pm file and then does something with it.
>
> The lopp for each file is in gather_data(), under the recurse branch:
>
> I'll redesign the code t
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Moin,
On Friday 23 September 2005 19:15, Michael G Schwern wrote:
> On Fri, Sep 23, 2005 at 05:38:32PM +0200, Tels wrote:
> > If you have any ideas how to make this even more usefull, please
> > speak now. I will have limited email reading/writing capabilities t
On Fri, Sep 23, 2005 at 05:38:32PM +0200, Tels wrote:
> If you have any ideas how to make this even more usefull, please speak
> now. I will have limited email reading/writing capabilities the next two
> weeks, but I *will* respond to all emails/critics/praises, even though it
> may only be when I
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Moin,
I updated the graph-perl-usage package, to be found on my site or CPAN:
http://bloodgate.com/perl/graph/usage/
http://search.cpan.org/~tels/
(0.07 is the latest version, please use together with 0.30 of Graph::Easy)
I incorporated one id
On Fri, May 13, 2005 at 05:18:40PM +0100, Tim Bunce wrote:
> On Fri, May 13, 2005 at 10:51:56AM +0200, Paul Johnson wrote:
> > On Fri, May 13, 2005 at 03:00:39PM +1000, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
> >
> > > [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
> > >
> > > >Covering the XS portion of the code with gcov is possi
Adam Kennedy wrote:
Michael Graham wrote:
[...]
But I think a more useful measure of kwalitee would be a 20%-30%
coverage test.
Something like that sounds much more reasonable than a high number.
Of course, if you've seen the first third of the PPI talk you realise we
still have all the pr
On Fri, Sep 23, 2005 at 12:06:43PM +0200, Thomas Klausner wrote:
> Hi!
>
> On Fri, Sep 23, 2005 at 12:54:42PM +1000, Adam Kennedy wrote:
>
> > Collecting any sort of coverage data is a complete bitch. Let me just
> > say right now that doing it across _all_ of CPAN is flat out impossible.
> >
Hi!
On Fri, Sep 23, 2005 at 12:54:42PM +1000, Adam Kennedy wrote:
> Collecting any sort of coverage data is a complete bitch. Let me just
> say right now that doing it across _all_ of CPAN is flat out impossible.
>
> It's impossible.
I completly agree.
Now, if somebody sets up a system to col
Michael Graham wrote:
As I was downloading the newest version of Devel::Cover this morning, I
pondered on the concept of 1 Kwalitee point for coverage >= 80%, and
another for 100%, and how absolutely impossible it would be to set out
to establish these points for all the modules on CPAN. But it w
11 matches
Mail list logo
