Hi!
On Wed, Sep 28, 2005 at 02:07:13PM +0200, David Landgren wrote:
> >>I have just re-read the summary of this list;
> >>
> >>"A list for discussing and planning CPANTS, the quality assurance effort
> >>for CPAN modules."
> >>
> >>and realised this is the wrong list for my last post.
> >
> >
> >
Thomas Klausner wrote:
Hi!
On Wed, Sep 28, 2005 at 12:41:31PM +0100, Gavin Henry wrote:
I have just re-read the summary of this list;
"A list for discussing and planning CPANTS, the quality assurance effort
for CPAN modules."
and realised this is the wrong list for my last post.
No it's
Hi!
On Wed, Sep 28, 2005 at 12:41:31PM +0100, Gavin Henry wrote:
> I have just re-read the summary of this list;
>
> "A list for discussing and planning CPANTS, the quality assurance effort
> for CPAN modules."
>
> and realised this is the wrong list for my last post.
No it's not.
The summary
Sorry Guys,
I have just re-read the summary of this list;
"A list for discussing and planning CPANTS, the quality assurance effort
for CPAN modules."
and realised this is the wrong list for my last post.
It's just that reading the archives:
http://www.mail-archive.com/perl-qa@perl.org/
that t
Dear List,
This is my first post here, so here goes.
I am in the process of authoring a new Test module called,
Test::Security::WWW, as we have a commercial Web Application to test, so I
thought this could be a good choice for CPAN (if my code is up to
scratch).
The goal of this new test module