On Sunday 08 January 2006 21:23, Matisse Enzer wrote:
> Do people think Test::Unit sucks? Simply not very well known?
It didn't use Test::Builder when I last looked at it, which meant that either
it or I would have had to reinvent lots of other useful modules I use often.
So far, Test::Class h
On Jan 8, 2006, at 9:23 PM, Matisse Enzer wrote:
I'm working on getting a large amount of "legacy code" under test
harnesses, and I'm wondering why Test::Unit isn't more widely used.
Andy Lester suggested I pose the question on this list.
Do people think Test::Unit sucks? Simply not very we
I'm working on getting a large amount of "legacy code" under test
harnesses, and I'm wondering why Test::Unit isn't more widely used.
Andy Lester suggested I pose the question on this list.
Do people think Test::Unit sucks? Simply not very well known?
An (admittedly rough) case for why I lik
Fellow QAers,
This script:
use strict;
BEGIN { binmode STDERR, ':utf8' }
use Test::More tests => 1;
diag "\x{201c}";
ok 1;
Outputs a warning when it runs:
Wide character in print at /usr/local/lib/perl5/5.8.7/Test/
Builder.pm line 1199.
This is annoying. I had thought that I cou
