The trouble is, EVERYONE wants to add just one more little dependency
(me included *cough*Params::Util*cough*).
I'll make you a deal.
Write this up. Then exhaustively test it on every single Perl platform
(50ish?) and every Perl version back to 5.004, including a random
collection similarly w
Chris Dolan <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> There is a class of tests that module authors perform that end users
> are not expected to run. For example code coverage tests, spelling
> tests, coding style tests, etc. These tests are either prohibitively
> expensive or complicated or unpredictab
On Wednesday 01 February 2006 00:26, demerphq wrote:
> And I think you've conveniently sidestepped my main point which is
> that TODO tests passing are errors.
I didn't sidestep it. I just disagree.
> Consider you have two TODO tests,
> both of which depend on a common set of functionality. Bo
Hi!
On Tue, Jan 31, 2006 at 10:36:47AM -0800, Tyler MacDonald wrote:
> OK, speaking of "Kwalitee", I saw cpants for the first time today.
> And saw that it claims to update every sunday, but there hasn't been an
> update since december 5th.
On the one hand I'm having problems with the serve
On 1/31/06, chromatic <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> On Tuesday 31 January 2006 13:31, A. Pagaltzis wrote:
>
> > Hmm. That's a good point. Maybe the way to approach this would be
> > to include a default harness for use by developer tools, which
> > would include more chattiness about passing TODO te
On 1/31/06, chromatic <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> On Tuesday 31 January 2006 12:22, A. Pagaltzis wrote:
> Adding more information to the default Test::Harness summary doesn't make
> sense to me. It's a user tool. It's important to list failures there, as
> the code might not work right, but unex
On 1/31/06, chromatic <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> On Tuesday 31 January 2006 11:44, A. Pagaltzis wrote:
>
> > * chromatic <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> [2006-01-31 19:40]:
>
> > >Write your own. perldoc Test::Harness::Straps or see the
> > >examples in chapter 3 of the Perl Testing book:
> >
> > That's not
