Re: "Erroneous" CPAN Testers Reports

2006-03-13 Thread A. Pagaltzis
* Adam Kennedy <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> [2006-03-14 05:15]: >Part of the problem comes in defining "bogus". I mean reports about tests which failed because the test box didn’t have the prerequisites installed and didn’t bother trying to either, or where the failed dependency is non-Perl, and so couldn’

Re: "Erroneous" CPAN Testers Reports

2006-03-13 Thread chromatic
On Monday 13 March 2006 20:08, Adam Kennedy wrote: > I know of at least a few developers that would consider a report to be > bogus if one of their dependencies cannot install. Now personally, I > consider that a failure on the part of BOTH of them. > > One for failing, and the other for adding a

Re: "Erroneous" CPAN Testers Reports

2006-03-13 Thread Adam Kennedy
A. Pagaltzis wrote: * David Golden <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> [2006-03-13 23:05]: This issue also has frustrated me for some time, but I don't think that we should be considering deleting reports. Reports are just facts -- they have no value basis. Yes, people may make judgments about the robustness o

Re: getting round Test::More test formatting trickiness

2006-03-13 Thread David Golden
Dr Bean wrote: I've gotten comfortable with Test::More conventions, but it's difficult in my editor to really quickly create lots of tests. is($o->index('You'), 1, 'objects index 1'); isnt($o->index(1), 1, 'objects index 2'); isnt($o->index(2), 2, 'objects index 2'); is($o->index($t), 3, 'object

Re: getting round Test::More test formatting trickiness

2006-03-13 Thread Dr Bean
On Tue, 14 Mar 2006, A. Pagaltzis wrote: > * Dr Bean <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> [2006-03-14 02:40]: > >is($o->index('You'), 1, 'objects index 1'); > >isnt($o->index(1), 1, 'objects index 2'); > >isnt($o->index(2), 2, 'objects index 2'); > >is($o->index($t), 3, 'objects index 3'); > >I need a more config

Re: "Erroneous" CPAN Testers Reports

2006-03-13 Thread David Golden
A. Pagaltzis wrote: * David Golden <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> [2006-03-13 23:05]: This issue also has frustrated me for some time, but I don't think that we should be considering deleting reports. Reports are just facts -- they have no value basis. Yes, people may make judgments about the robustness o

Re: getting round Test::More test formatting trickiness

2006-03-13 Thread A. Pagaltzis
* Dr Bean <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> [2006-03-14 02:40]: >is($o->index('You'), 1, 'objects index 1'); >isnt($o->index(1), 1, 'objects index 2'); >isnt($o->index(2), 2, 'objects index 2'); >is($o->index($t), 3, 'objects index 3'); > >Incrementing numbers and substituting words and letters takes >time becau

getting round Test::More test formatting trickiness

2006-03-13 Thread Dr Bean
I've gotten comfortable with Test::More conventions, but it's difficult in my editor to really quickly create lots of tests. is($o->index('You'), 1, 'objects index 1'); isnt($o->index(1), 1, 'objects index 2'); isnt($o->index(2), 2, 'objects index 2'); is($o->index($t), 3, 'objects index 3'); Inc

Re: "Erroneous" CPAN Testers Reports

2006-03-13 Thread A. Pagaltzis
* David Golden <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> [2006-03-13 23:05]: >This issue also has frustrated me for some time, but I don't >think that we should be considering deleting reports. Reports >are just facts -- they have no value basis. Yes, people may make >judgments about the robustness of a module based on

Re: "Erroneous" CPAN Testers Reports

2006-03-13 Thread Yuval Kogman
On Mon, Mar 13, 2006 at 14:31:53 -0700, Jerry D. Hedden wrote: > Today, I filed a bug report against CPANPLUS because it > sometimes fails to detect missing prerequisites, resulting > in bogus FAIL reports being generated against modules: >http://rt.cpan.org/Ticket/Display.html?id=18144 > Here

Re: "Erroneous" CPAN Testers Reports

2006-03-13 Thread Tels
Moin, On Monday 13 March 2006 23:01, David Golden wrote: > Jerry D. Hedden wrote: > > In addition to getting CPANPLUS fixed, I feel there is the > > issue of what to do about such fallacious reports in the > > CPAN Testers database. Currently, there is no functionality > > for deleting such repor

Re: "Erroneous" CPAN Testers Reports

2006-03-13 Thread David Golden
Jerry D. Hedden wrote: In addition to getting CPANPLUS fixed, I feel there is the issue of what to do about such fallacious reports in the CPAN Testers database. Currently, there is no functionality for deleting such reports. This issue also has frustrated me for some time, but I don't think t

"Erroneous" CPAN Testers Reports

2006-03-13 Thread Jerry D. Hedden
Today, I filed a bug report against CPANPLUS because it sometimes fails to detect missing prerequisites, resulting in bogus FAIL reports being generated against modules: http://rt.cpan.org/Ticket/Display.html?id=18144 Here are two examples of such failures: http://www.nntp.perl.org/group/perl