On Sat, Apr 01, 2006 at 04:04:42PM -0800, Jeffrey Thalhammer wrote:
> I have never actually had an opportunity to practice
> this, but I've always felt that the most obvious way
> to combine test-driven development with pair
> programming was to have one person write test code
> while the other per
I have done the "two programmers, one terminal" approach advocated by
Beck for XP developments (not just TDD) and it worked well. We delivered
on time with all features present and correct (where correct means the
application passed the customers Business Acceptance Tests - first
time).
I should
Adam Kennedy wrote:
While the code for the distribution might be able to die like this,
the INSTALLER should fail in a way that is detectable and automatable.
If the Cd warnings.pm module can't be found, it crashes
(specifically, dies) and say it can't find warnings. But the problem
isn't th
demerphq wrote:
On 4/2/06, Adam Kennedy <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
demerphq wrote:
On 4/1/06, Adam Kennedy <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Similarly
if somebody has an error in their Build.PL or Makefile.PL are you
going to say that the "installer" doesnt work?
Yes, absolutely.
So you would f