Re: CPANDB - was: Module::Dependency 1.84

Tels wrote: -BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 Moin, On Wednesday 12 July 2006 03:13, David Golden wrote: Tels wrote: My idea was to build _only_ the database, and do it right, simple and easy to use and then get everyone else to just use the DB instead of fiddling with their own.

Re: CPANDB - was: Module::Dependency 1.84

On Wed, Jul 12, 2006 at 03:03:14AM +0200, Tels wrote: > -BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- > Hash: SHA1 > > Moin Tim, > > On Tuesday 11 July 2006 18:34, Tim Bunce wrote: > > I needed some code to trawl through a directory tree parsing perl > > modules and scripts to determine their dependencies.

Re: TAP diagnostic syntax proposal

If only we had some kind of standard language for marking things up that was extensible... and wasn't met with universal disapproval, F On 12/07/06, Jonathan Rockway <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > Did you guys consider the problem of newlines in content? > This is a good question. Implementin

Re: CPANDB - was: Module::Dependency 1.84

-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 Moin, On Wednesday 12 July 2006 03:13, David Golden wrote: > Tels wrote: > > My idea was to build _only_ the database, and do it right, simple and > > easy to use and then get everyone else to just use the DB instead of > > fiddling with their own. (s

Re: TAP diagnostic syntax proposal

* Jonathan Rockway <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> [2006-07-12 17:50]: > Things to think about :) This is the time in our program where we stop to consider what it means that DJB, who wrote that advice/rant, also wrote an RFC2822 parser. Regards, -- Aristotle Pagaltzis //

Re: fetching module version from the command line

On Jul 12, 2006, at 03:41, Gabor Szabo wrote: perl -MModule -e'print $Module::VERSION' I have this alias set up: function pv () { perl -M$1 -le "print $1->VERSION"; } I think that calling ->VERSION is more correct. Best, David

Re: TAP diagnostic syntax proposal

Did you guys consider the problem of newlines in content? This is a good question. Implementing your own file format means you have a big-bag-o-quoting problems. How do you print a verbatim newline? What about a verbatim single quote? What about Unicode? What about a new line then "

Re: TAP diagnostic syntax proposal

Jonathan T. Rockway wrote: I agree that "got" is generally a good word to avoid in formal writing, but in a testing protocol I think that it's an acceptable abbreviation No! Do not accept inferior substitutes, strive for perfection. for "the actual result". Especially since "received" doesn'

Re: fetching module version from the command line

On 12 Jul 2006 11:52:07 -, Rafael Garcia-Suarez <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > "Gabor Szabo" wrote in perl.qa : > > While checking if the versions of all the modules are as > > required in our installation I am using the following one liner to > > fetch the version numbers. > > > > perl -MModule

Re: TAP diagnostic syntax proposal

On 7/11/06, Adam Kennedy <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: Fair enough a "Layer 1" TAP parser might not care, but why not make it as equally easy to implement a "Layer 2" parser as well. Bingo. -- Ian Langworth

Re: fetching module version from the command line

"Gabor Szabo" wrote in perl.qa : > While checking if the versions of all the modules are as > required in our installation I am using the following one liner to > fetch the version numbers. > > perl -MModule -e'print $Module::VERSION' You should probably use -mModule to avoid calling Module::impor

Re: fetching module version from the command line

On Wed, 12 Jul 2006 13:41:16 +0300, "Gabor Szabo" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > While checking if the versions of all the modules are as > required in our installation I am using the following one liner to > fetch the version numbers. > > perl -MModule -e'print $Module::VERSION' Not really reliab

Re: fetching module version from the command line

On 7/12/06, Gabor Szabo <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: While checking if the versions of all the modules are as required in our installation I am using the following one liner to fetch the version numbers. perl -MModule -e'print $Module::VERSION' This one-liner doesn't work all the time in modul

fetching module version from the command line

While checking if the versions of all the modules are as required in our installation I am using the following one liner to fetch the version numbers. perl -MModule -e'print $Module::VERSION' Some of the modules print extra error messages and some print only error messages. I have sent e-mail to

Re: TAP diagnostic syntax proposal

* Adam Kennedy <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> [2006-07-12 06:10]: > Fair enough a "Layer 1" TAP parser might not care, but why not > make it as equally easy to implement a "Layer 2" parser as > well. +1 Did you guys consider the problem of newlines in content? Regards, -- Aristotle Pagaltzis //

Re: TAP Namespace Nonproliferation Treaty

Ian Langworth writes: > Ovid: TAP::Parser::Pedantic > > Schwern: TAP::Parser::Heuristic That's the best idea: nobody claiming that his particular parser is _the_ TAP::Parser (or even _the_ TAPx::Parser), but giving them parallel names with adjectives that hint at ways in which they differ. Even