> On Wed, 26 Jul 2006 12:10:07 +0800, Adam Kennedy <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> said:
> I do agree, but if you are going to do that we should know NOT to tell
> people on failing platforms to do something we know is going to fail.
> So if we know it doesn't work on Windows (for example) we shoul
Andreas J. Koenig wrote:
On Thu, 20 Jul 2006 02:35:02 +1000, Adam Kennedy <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> said:
> On the other hand, give me an easy to use, works _everywhere_, never
> fails falsely positive or negative, never crashes, low-dependency
> security enhancement to CPAN clients that I ne
> On Thu, 20 Jul 2006 02:35:02 +1000, Adam Kennedy <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> said:
> On the other hand, give me an easy to use, works _everywhere_, never
> fails falsely positive or negative, never crashes, low-dependency
> security enhancement to CPAN clients that I never have to think about,
> On Wed, 26 Jul 2006 04:08:05 +0200, "A. Pagaltzis" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> said:
> I’ll assume you didn’t actually mean it the way it came out; that
> you were actually complaining about the tools. I agree that
> Module::Signature falls far short of doing an adequate job; no
> arg
> On Wed, 19 Jul 2006 18:09:08 +0200, "A. Pagaltzis" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> said:
>> Maybe we need a perlish kind of building it. It's not perlish
>> to show each other a passport and make sure that the image
>> there matches the face.
> hmm, I don’t know how else you’d do it; at lea
On Jul 21, 2006, at 12:58 AM, Adam Kennedy wrote:
It's at this point I make very quiet noises about YAML::Tiny, and
how it only supports ordinary data, so things like objects and
circulars and other crazy things can't happen.
It's not "done" yet, but the basics all should work.
You might
* Adam Kennedy <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> [2006-07-19 18:40]:
> My biggest criticism of every attempt I've seen at adding more
> security is that it reduces utility. And since we've NEVER
> (yet) had a security violation that I'm aware of, the net
> result is we just sacrifice utility for potential securi
Hi Salve!
See below for my comments.
On Monday 24 July 2006 16:23, Salve J Nilsen wrote:
> Shlomi Fish wrote:
> > On Wednesday 19 July 2006 17:08, Salve J Nilsen wrote:
> >> Just a wild thought...
> >>
> >> Would it be useful to check for references to community support channels
> >> like mailing
- Original Message
From: jerry gay <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
># the following items are hashes because they are sparse arrays
> these don't seem to be hashes, as the comment suggests.
Ah, thanks. That was from an older version. I'll clear that out.
Cheers,
Ovid
