Re: New TAP Grammar

2006-09-15 Thread Michael G Schwern
Adam Kennedy wrote: > It might be worth running Perl::MinimumVersion over the codebase real > quick. > > It has all the obvious stuff coded into it (like warnings and qr//) > already. Swanky! Some minor nits (-v not documented, documented output not the same as actual output). And I can think

Re: MakeMaker and extra information in test reports

2006-09-15 Thread Michael G Schwern
Gabor Szabo wrote: > During perl Makefile.PL I am going to read the installed version of some C > header files. I would like this information to be included in the test > report. > > What is the correct way to do this ? > Just print to STDOUT or to STDERR? STDERR

Re: New TAP Grammar

2006-09-15 Thread Michael G Schwern
Chris Dolan wrote: >> token description { <-[#\n]>+ } > > The description can't start with a number if there is a test number: isn't? > token description { <-[#\n\d]> <-[#\n]>* }

Re: New TAP Grammar

2006-09-15 Thread Nicholas Clark
On Thu, Sep 14, 2006 at 09:28:19PM -0400, Michael G Schwern wrote: > Ovid wrote: > > Also, for purposes of backwards compatability, I'm concerned about qr// and > > $code->(). > > When were those first introduced in Perl? I don't want someone using > > really old versions to not be able to use

Re: New TAP Grammar

2006-09-15 Thread Paul Johnson
On Thu, Sep 14, 2006 at 09:28:19PM -0400, Michael G Schwern wrote: > Ovid wrote: > > Also, for purposes of backwards compatability, I'm concerned about qr// > > and $code->(). When were those first introduced in Perl? I don't want > > someone using really old versions to not be able to use this c

MakeMaker and extra information in test reports

2006-09-15 Thread Gabor Szabo
During perl Makefile.PL I am going to read the installed version of some C header files. I would like this information to be included in the test report. What is the correct way to do this ? Just print to STDOUT or to STDERR? Gabor