I'm not sure you can reliably test that though, not to 100% anyway,
given the problem of implicit params.
is( foo $bar, $baz, $expected );
which means
is( foo($bar, $baz), $expected );
Yes, his specific case is ok, but I think you need to be a bit cunning
about how you check...
Adam K
Chr
On Nov 7, 2006, at 6:15 PM, Christopher H. Laco wrote:
I just wanted to get some thoughts on this before I filed a bug report
with either PPI or Perl::Critic:
I'm going through and testing all of my *.t files for
RequireTestLabels.
I was humming right along when I ran into an oddity. The new
I just wanted to get some thoughts on this before I filed a bug report
with either PPI or Perl::Critic:
I'm going through and testing all of my *.t files for RequireTestLabels.
I was humming right along when I ran into an oddity. The newest
Perl::Critic 0.21 + PPI 1.118 complains that the tests do
Hi!
On Tue, Nov 07, 2006 at 06:58:11AM +0100, A. Pagaltzis wrote:
> But yeah, other than that, I agree, the metric should check that
> META.yml conforms to the spec it says it conforms to, and that
> a metric that checks for conformance to the latest version should
> be a bonus, if it exists at a
