RE: Test::Builder feature request

2007-01-13 Thread leif . eriksen
I know this is iseveral days old , but we in Oz get the weekend before almost anyone else so bear with me. When dealing with a BoM (Ball of Mud), there is a fundamental collision of two concerns here. 1. To test the code, you need to change it. 2. Before changing the code, you should test it.

Re: Test::Builder feature request

2007-01-13 Thread James E Keenan
chromatic wrote: the "Star Trek: Generations" fallacy. You steal a spaceship, which flies through space, to fly through space to a planet, flying through space, where a temporal anomaly, which also flies through space, deflected by a supernova, which you flew through space in your spaceship

Re: Test Coverage vs. Refactoring

2007-01-13 Thread Dominique Quatravaux
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 Shlomi Fish wrote: > Now we only have to cover the outcomes of the condition in only one function. > (or two different outcomes in different functions). So our test coverage is > not as comprehensive as the previous one. Well, I don't think that the te