Re: TAPx::Parser 0.50_06 -- Now on Windows!

2007-01-19 Thread Ovid
--- demerphq <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > Just a thought but recently there has been a bit of work on p5p about > getting smoke testing of perl working properly on Win32. > > One of the critical problems is of hanging tests causing the smoke > process to stall. I suppose timeouts would be a good

Re: Module::ScanDeps

2007-01-19 Thread Steffen Mueller
Hi Eric, thanks for bringing this issue to a wider audience. M::SD could *really* use some reasonable tests. Eric Wilhelm schrieb: [...] What's the best way to test this sort of thing? I could certainly run some simple checks on core modules, but I envision myself quickly getting into diffe

Re: TAPx::Parser 0.50_06 -- Now on Windows!

2007-01-19 Thread demerphq
On 1/18/07, Ovid <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: Hi all, I've just released 0.50_06 to the CPAN. This should be called the 'Andy Armstrong' release because he's tracked down several irritating bugs and made it work on Windows! Just a thought but recently there has been a bit of work on p5p about ge

Module::ScanDeps

2007-01-19 Thread Eric Wilhelm
Hi all, Anybody like testing and depend on PAR to work? If so, Module::ScanDeps *badly* needs your help. There are currently only two tests, one of which is conditional on Module::Pluggable, the other of which doesn't provide much coverage. What's the best way to test this sort of thing? I