On 31 Mar 2007, at 23:14, Thomas Klausner wrote:
Even though I was fighting mail servers today, I managed to put some
time aside
for long-needed CPANTS improvements. (And I really have to thank the
Catalyst/DBIC-guys for their wonderfull tools which made me finish a big
project on time (more on
On Saturday 31 March 2007 21:06, Shlomi Fish wrote:
> On Sunday 01 April 2007, chromatic wrote:
> > Maybe so, but how else can CPANTS detect that you use the world's most
> > advanced version control system: CVS?
> CVS is not advanced as:
> 1. Microsoft Visual SourceSafe - the only sane choice
On Sunday 01 April 2007, chromatic wrote:
> On Saturday 31 March 2007 15:26, Yuval Kogman wrote:
> > uses_version_control sounds more like lacks_manifest_skip_file which
> > should deduct kwalitee IMHO.
>
> Maybe so, but how else can CPANTS detect that you use the world's most
> advanced version co
Oh, ++.
On 3/31/07, Thomas Klausner <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
Hi!
Even though I was fighting mail servers today, I managed to put some time aside
for long-needed CPANTS improvements. (And I really have to thank the
Catalyst/DBIC-guys for their wonderfull tools which made me finish a big
projec
On 31 Mar 2007, at 23:14, Thomas Klausner wrote:
Even though I was fighting mail servers today, I managed to put
some time aside
for long-needed CPANTS improvements. (And I really have to thank the
Catalyst/DBIC-guys for their wonderfull tools which made me finish
a big
project on time (more
--- Adrian Howard <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Nice idea. Looking very like David Golden's ToolSet module, or
> Damian's Toolkit. Could you extend one of those?
Toolkit is a bit more problematic for my needs, but ToolSet looks
interesting.
Cheers,
Ovid
--
Buy the book -- http://www.oreilly.c
On Saturday 31 March 2007 15:26, Yuval Kogman wrote:
> uses_version_control sounds more like lacks_manifest_skip_file which
> should deduct kwalitee IMHO.
Maybe so, but how else can CPANTS detect that you use the world's most
advanced version control system: CVS?
-- c
On Sat, Mar 31, 2007 at 18:26:26 -0400, Yuval Kogman wrote:
> uses_version_control sounds more like lacks_manifest_skip_file which
> should deduct kwalitee IMHO.
Hmm... reading into the other metrics, it seems like you were
kidding. My bad ;-)
--
Yuval Kogman <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
http://nothi
uses_version_control sounds more like lacks_manifest_skip_file which
should deduct kwalitee IMHO.
--
Yuval Kogman <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
http://nothingmuch.woobling.org 0xEBD27418
pgpsXwQhXSOWB.pgp
Description: PGP signature
Hi!
Even though I was fighting mail servers today, I managed to put some time aside
for long-needed CPANTS improvements. (And I really have to thank the
Catalyst/DBIC-guys for their wonderfull tools which made me finish a big
project on time (more on this later...))
So, the new CPANTS metrics are
Hiya,
On 29 Mar 2007, at 21:08, Ovid wrote:
[snip]
package My::Tests;
use Test::Custom qw(
Test::More
Test::Differences
Test::Exception
);
1;
Nice idea. Looking very like David Golden's ToolSet module, or
Damian's Toolkit. Could you extend one of those?
Adrian
On 31 Mar 2007, at 12:34, Adam Kennedy wrote:
We're defining a subset of YAML (YAMLish) that should be simple
to implement in many languages. YAMLish was based initially on
the YAML subset that YAML::Tiny supports. Since then I've made it
able to handle arbitrary strings as hash keys (YA
Kirrily Robert wrote:
In September 2001, apparently all aglow in the excitement of all the
talk that was going on about testing and whatnot, I wrote a module
called CPAN::Test::Reporter.
(http://search.cpan.org/~skud/CPAN-Test-Reporter-0.02/) Looking at it,
I have no idea what I was thinking or
We're defining a subset of YAML (YAMLish) that should be simple to
implement in many languages. YAMLish was based initially on the YAML
subset that YAML::Tiny supports. Since then I've made it able to
handle arbitrary strings as hash keys (YAML::Tiny needs hash keys
like \w\S+).
Except fo
14 matches
Mail list logo
