Re: [ANNOUNCE] Test::Builder/More/Simple 0.72

2007-09-19 Thread chromatic
On Wednesday 19 September 2007 22:46:19 Ovid wrote: > This has happened a couple of times now. Why don't you use release > devel versions so that these issues become less serious in the future? In your experience, do devel versions get the kind of testing that would catch these issues sufficien

Re: [ANNOUNCE] Test::Builder/More/Simple 0.72

2007-09-19 Thread Ovid
--- Michael G Schwern <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > Because of this I'm TEMPORARILY rolling the fix back at least a week > to give > CPAN authors a little breathing room to make their fixes. The fix is > usually to plan in a BEGIN block. This has happened a couple of times now. Why don't you use

[ANNOUNCE] Test::Builder/More/Simple 0.72

2007-09-19 Thread Michael G Schwern
This release unfixes a bug. 0.71 fixed a bug where if you ran a use_ok() inside a BEGIN block without a plan it would silently fail and the test would continue. For example... use Test::More; plan tests => 10; BEGIN { use_ok("Some::Module") } It looks like you planned

Re: Planning talk on Devel::Cover

2007-09-19 Thread Michael Carman
On 9/12/2007 7:41 PM, James E Keenan wrote: > I'd also like to hear any other coverage-related ideas you think would > be worthwhile bringing up at this workshop. Here's my 2ยข For applications with code in multiple modules use the options for including and excluding files (-ignore, +inc, -select

Re: [ANNOUNCE] Test::Builder/More/Simple 0.71

2007-09-19 Thread Michael G Schwern
Rafael Garcia-Suarez wrote: > And tests now pass with following change. > It takes care of > a/ pushing the right dirs in @INC when running in the perl core test suite > b/ fixes the $VERSION of Dummy.pm. Apparently bleadperl comes with > another version of Dummy.pm than Test::Simple don't

Re: Test::Pod / YAML explodes (and taking cpants with it...)

2007-09-19 Thread brian d foy
In article <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>, David Cantrell <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > Number::Phone::UK::Data contains a big chunk of binary gibberish at the > end of the file (it's an embedded DBM::Deep database), in a __DATA__ > segment. That includes several "lines" that match /^=/ and so might > lo

Re: [ANNOUNCE] Test::Builder/More/Simple 0.71

2007-09-19 Thread Rafael Garcia-Suarez
On 19/09/2007, Steve Peters <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > On Tue, Sep 18, 2007 at 06:03:13PM -0700, Michael G Schwern wrote: > > Jerry D. Hedden wrote: > > > Michael G Schwern wrote: > > >> http://www.pobox.com/~schwern/src/Test-Simple-0.71.tar.gz > > > > > > BTW, when to you plan to submit a patch

Re: [ANNOUNCE] Test::Builder/More/Simple 0.71

2007-09-19 Thread Steve Peters
On Tue, Sep 18, 2007 at 06:03:13PM -0700, Michael G Schwern wrote: > Jerry D. Hedden wrote: > > Michael G Schwern wrote: > >> http://www.pobox.com/~schwern/src/Test-Simple-0.71.tar.gz > > > > BTW, when to you plan to submit a patch for this against blead? > > Magic p5p fairies usually take care o

Re: Bug fix in Test::More 0.71 may reveal failures tests

2007-09-19 Thread Steve Peters
On Sat, Sep 15, 2007 at 05:06:01AM -0700, Michael G Schwern wrote: > Test::More 0.71 fixed a subtle bug where a call to use_ok() inside a BEGIN > block without a plan would be silently ignored. That is... > > use Test::More; > > BEGIN { use_ok('Exporter') } # for example > >