On 9/14/2007 3:50 PM, Paul Johnson wrote:
>
> Most of the infrastructure is in place for path coverage, but the data
> isn't collected at the moment.
Ooh, would that provide the data I need to fix the conditional coverage report?
-mjc
This week's Perl 5 Wiki topic improvement drive is...
Recommended Modules For Testing
http://www.perlfoundation.org/perl5/index.cgi?recommended_modules_for_testing
Right now there's only TWO modules listed. I know a few people have written
good testing modules out there.
The
On 9/20/07, demerphq <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> The solution is to add a dummy line to f() to make sure that it mentions $x.
>
> {
> my $x = 'A';
> sub f { my $y=$x; sub { print \$x; $x++ } }
> sub g { sub { print \$x; $x++ } if $x }
> }
My experience was just a void
On Thu, Sep 20, 2007 at 11:48:15AM +0200, demerphq wrote:
> On 9/20/07, flw <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > C:\>cat ttt.pl
> > use strict;
> > use warnings;
> >
> > {
> > my $x = 'A';
> > sub f { sub { $x++ } }
> > sub g { sub { $x++ } if $x }
> > }
> >
> > my $F=f();
> > my $G=g();
> >
C:\>cat ttt.pl
use strict;
use warnings;
{
my $x = 'A';
sub f { sub { $x++ } }
sub g { sub { $x++ } if $x }
}
my $F=f();
my $G=g();
print $F->(),$G->(),"," for 1..4;
print "\n";
C:\>ttt.pl
0A,1B,2C,3D,
C:\>
Ovid wrote:
> For something as high profile as Test::Simple, it would get much more
> exposure than most modules. Plus, there wasn't much in the changelog
> which suggested this was a rush OMG Must Deliver Now sort of change (it
> had been six months since the last release).
I get a bug up my ass
Ovid wrote:
> --- Michael G Schwern <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
>> Because of this I'm TEMPORARILY rolling the fix back at least a week
>> to give
>> CPAN authors a little breathing room to make their fixes. The fix is
>> usually to plan in a BEGIN block.
>
> This has happened a couple of times
On 9/20/07, flw <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> C:\>cat ttt.pl
> use strict;
> use warnings;
>
> {
> my $x = 'A';
> sub f { sub { $x++ } }
> sub g { sub { $x++ } if $x }
> }
>
> my $F=f();
> my $G=g();
>
> print $F->(),$G->(),"," for 1..4;
> print "\n";
>
> C:\>ttt.pl
> 0A,1B,2C,3D,
>
> C:
On Thursday 20 September 2007 00:15:31 Ovid wrote:
> > In your experience, do devel versions get the kind of testing that
> > would catch these issues sufficiently?
> >
> > In my experience, they don't.
>
> For something as high profile as Test::Simple, it would get much more
> exposure than most
--- chromatic <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> On Wednesday 19 September 2007 22:46:19 Ovid wrote:
>
> > This has happened a couple of times now. Why don't you use release
> > devel versions so that these issues become less serious in the
> future?
>
> In your experience, do devel versions get the
10 matches
Mail list logo
