It's been in alpha for a while now and no reported failures, so we're
all good right?
Has anyone used it on a run of smoke tests? It's been less than a month
since we had a similar discussion about Test::More.
--Eric
--
Chicken farmer's observation: Clunk is the past tense of cluck.
--- Adrian Howard <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > use Test::Load
> > lib => 'lib/',
> > same_versions => 0,
> > todo => { packages => [EMAIL PROTECTED], reason => $todo_reason },
> > skip => { packages => [EMAIL PROTECTED], reason => $skip_reason };
> [snip]
>
> I l
On 3 Oct 2007, at 15:27, Ovid wrote:
I'm thinking about writing Test::Load (similar to Test::Class::Load).
It would be a wrapper around http://use.perl.org/~Ovid/journal/34596.
Basically, you'd do something like this in t/00-load.t (or whatever
you
call it):
use Test::Load
lib
--- Andy Lester <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > I'm thinking about writing Test::Load (similar to
> Test::Class::Load).
> > It would be a wrapper around
> http://use.perl.org/~Ovid/journal/34596.
>
> My first thought is that you were talking about load testing.
Yeah, it's a crappy name. Test::Us
On Oct 3, 2007, at 9:27 AM, Ovid wrote:
I'm thinking about writing Test::Load (similar to Test::Class::Load).
It would be a wrapper around http://use.perl.org/~Ovid/journal/34596.
My first thought is that you were talking about load testing.
xoa
--
Andy Lester => [EMAIL PROTECTED] => www.pe
--- Ovid <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> I'm thinking about writing Test::Load (similar to Test::Class::Load).
> It would be a wrapper around http://use.perl.org/~Ovid/journal/34596.
Sigh. Wrong link. It would be a wrapper around:
http://www.perlmonks.org/?node_id=642327
Cheers,
Ovid
--
Buy
I'm thinking about writing Test::Load (similar to Test::Class::Load).
It would be a wrapper around http://use.perl.org/~Ovid/journal/34596.
Basically, you'd do something like this in t/00-load.t (or whatever you
call it):
use Test::Load
lib => 'lib/',
same_versions => 0,
