Is the code for implementing this metric available now? I'm interested
in using it to create a utility that generates the appropriate entries
in a form suitable for use in Build.PL and Makefile.PL format.
---
Matisse Enzer <[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Hi!
On Thu, Nov 22, 2007 at 12:25:49PM +0100, David Landgren wrote:
> I have just looked at the latest CPANTS results. I see that all my modules
> fail this metric... but I am unsure as to why. Consider:
>
> http://cpants.perl.org/dist/prereq/Integer-Partition
>
> I agree, it's probably best t
David Cantrell writes:
> On Thu, Nov 22, 2007 at 12:25:49PM +0100, David Landgren wrote:
>
> > do I really declare pragmas like 'strict' and 'vars'? How many ISPs
> > remove *them*?
>
> Excluding pragmata that have been in core since at least 5.6 would be
> a good idea, I think.
Really? Person
On Thu, Nov 22, 2007 at 12:25:49PM +0100, David Landgren wrote:
> Thomas Klausner wrote:
> >The metric will be called prereq_matches_use and shall check if all the
> >modules used in a dist are also listed as a prereq.
>
> http://cpants.perl.org/dist/prereq/Integer-Partition
>
> I agree, it's p
Thomas Klausner wrote:
The metric will be called prereq_matches_use and shall check if all the
modules used in a dist are also listed as a prereq. (prereq is either
gatherd directly from Meta.YMLs 'requires', by parsing Build.PL or
Makefile.PL)
As you might know this is quite tricky, because
