Jonathan Rockway wrote:
# Failed test at t/new.t line 42.
# Structures begin differing at:
# $got->[0] = (?i-xsm:foo)
# $expected->[0] = (?-xism:foo)
# Looks like you failed 1 test of 24.
Are you positive you didn't mean to say qr/foo/i ? Are you sure that
$peu->stop_uris s
Ian Malpass wrote:
I got a failure message from CPAN testers for Pod::Extract::URI for
5.11.0 patch 33001 on Linux 2.6.22-3-amd64
(x86_64-linux-thread-multi-ld)[0]
The failures were where I was testing to see if an arrayref of qr//
patterns was the array I was expecting. is_deeply() has heret
On Fri, 2008-01-18 at 17:22 -0600, Jonathan Rockway wrote:
> On Fri, 2008-01-18 at 16:57 -0600, Ian Malpass wrote:
> > I got a failure message from CPAN testers for Pod::Extract::URI for
> > 5.11.0 patch 33001 on Linux 2.6.22-3-amd64 (x86_64-linux-thread-multi-ld)[0]
> >
> > The failures were wh
On Fri, 2008-01-18 at 16:57 -0600, Ian Malpass wrote:
> I got a failure message from CPAN testers for Pod::Extract::URI for
> 5.11.0 patch 33001 on Linux 2.6.22-3-amd64 (x86_64-linux-thread-multi-ld)[0]
>
> The failures were where I was testing to see if an arrayref of qr//
> patterns was the a
I got a failure message from CPAN testers for Pod::Extract::URI for
5.11.0 patch 33001 on Linux 2.6.22-3-amd64 (x86_64-linux-thread-multi-ld)[0]
The failures were where I was testing to see if an arrayref of qr//
patterns was the array I was expecting. is_deeply() has heretofore
worked perfect
# from Adam Kennedy
# on Friday 18 January 2008 00:23:
>Eric Wilhelm wrote:
>>This is not a command-line
>> conditional bail, but rather "the module won't even load for some
>> reason and thus testing anything else is pointless".
>> ...
>Well, possibly.
>
>The bail outs you'd keep long term are in
Eric Wilhelm wrote:
# from Geoffrey Young
# on Tuesday 15 January 2008 11:49:
what I think many are asking for is for Test::Builder to be able to
issue the appropriate TAP on $condition.
Where $condition is a run-time option set at the command-line, not
hardcoded into the test.
Writing "or
