Re: TODO Tests

2008-05-14 Thread Aristotle Pagaltzis
* Michael G Schwern <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> [2008-05-14 08:50]: > As I understand it, you want to know when broken code breaks > differently. Indeed. > I can sort of see the point as a regression test... sort of. > But if you're at the point of fussiness that broken code has to > break in a specific

Re: HARNESS_ACTIVE when it's not

2008-05-14 Thread Andy Armstrong
On 14 May 2008, at 17:11, Michael Peters wrote: So here's a bit of a pickle. Just by using TAP::Harness $ENV{HARNESS_ACTIVE} gets set to true. This seems odd since you can you it outside of a running test. And this causes problems with Smolder. When I'm running the test suite I don't want it

HARNESS_ACTIVE when it's not

2008-05-14 Thread Michael Peters
So here's a bit of a pickle. Just by using TAP::Harness $ENV{HARNESS_ACTIVE} gets set to true. This seems odd since you can you it outside of a running test. And this causes problems with Smolder. When I'm running the test suite I don't want it to do certain things (like actually send email alerts)

Re: TAP Frameworks Continue to Spread

2008-05-14 Thread Ovid
--- chromatic <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > PHP's Symfony has a test framework called lime, based on Test::More: > > http://www.symfony-project.org/book/1_0/15-Unit-and-Functional-Testing > > I just heard about a C++ test framework based on lime called lemon: > > http://eric.scrivnercreative.com