Re: Test::NoWarnings and plan skip_all don't like each other

2008/5/15 Ovid <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>: > - Original Message > >> From: Fergal Daly <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> >> To: Gabor Szabo <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> >> Cc: Perl QA >> Sent: Thursday, May 15, 2008 1:15:50 PM >> Subject: Re: Test::NoWarnings and plan skip_all don't like each other >> >> This is becau

Re: Test::NoWarnings and plan skip_all don't like each other

- Original Message > From: Fergal Daly <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > To: Gabor Szabo <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > Cc: Perl QA > Sent: Thursday, May 15, 2008 1:15:50 PM > Subject: Re: Test::NoWarnings and plan skip_all don't like each other > > This is because skip_all exists immediately but Test::NoWa

Re: Test::NoWarnings and plan skip_all don't like each other

This is because skip_all exists immediately but Test::NoWarnings has installed an END block that will run a test anyway. I suppose I should change T::NW to detect "skip_all" and not run its test but at the moment there is no T::B API for detecting "skip_all". MScwern, do you want to add one? What

Test::NoWarnings and plan skip_all don't like each other

Yesterday I was happy to notice that you can use Test::Warn together with Test::NoWarnings. So you can test for a watning in a specific test while testing that nothing else gives a warning.\ Good. :-) Today I found out that if you skip_all tests while you have Test::NoWarnings your test will f