Hi!
On Tue, Jun 03, 2008 at 03:55:38PM +0300, Gabor Szabo wrote:
> > Is CPANTS looking for something special inside the LICENSE file?
>
> The currently running version of CPANTS has that bug.
> I think I have fixed that already in the SVN we just have to wait till Thomas
> has some time to upgra
On May 26, 2008, at 4:00 PM, Andy Lester wrote:
http://binstock.blogspot.com/2008/05/is-popularity-of-unit-tests-waning.html
FYI: new book on unit testing:
xUnit Test Patterns: Refactoring Test Code
http://www.amazon.com/dp/0131495054/
On 08/06/03 15:55 +0300, Gabor Szabo wrote:
> On Tue, Jun 3, 2008 at 3:24 PM, Paul Fenwick <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > The 'has_separate_license_file' test returns 'not ok' on:
> >
> >http://cpants.perl.org/dist/kwalitee/IPC-System-Simple
[...]
> >
> > Is CPANTS looking for something spe
On Tue, Jun 3, 2008 at 3:24 PM, Paul Fenwick <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> G'day QA folks,
>
> I'm gaming my CPANTS quality scores a little, and I've found one of the
> optional metrics has given me an odd result.
>
> The 'has_separate_license_file' test returns 'not ok' on:
>
>http://cpants
G'day QA folks,
I'm gaming my CPANTS quality scores a little, and I've found one of the
optional metrics has given me an odd result.
The 'has_separate_license_file' test returns 'not ok' on:
http://cpants.perl.org/dist/kwalitee/IPC-System-Simple
However, IPC-System-Simple *does* have
