* Eric Wilhelm <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> [2008-08-07 23:35]:
> So how far do you scroll back, how do find the error message,
> and what happens when the root cause has outrun the history
> buffer?
It’s not 1998 anymore, you can easily have your terminals keep
40,000 lines of scrollback or however many.
On 7 Aug 2008, at 22:34, Eric Wilhelm wrote:
I would say it only appears if the tests failed. I would prefer
that to
take focus rather than needing to go activate it. Would you rather
scrollback to read the diagnostics in your terminal?
Is that so odd? Emphatically YES - I would rather scroll
--- On Thu, 7/8/08, Eric Wilhelm <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> So how far do you scroll back, how do find the error
> message, and what
> happens when the root cause has outrun the history buffer?
I don't have to scroll back at all. I just have my tests die on first failure.
use Test::Most q
* "David E. Wheeler" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> [2008-08-07T00:31:27]
> On Aug 6, 2008, at 20:12, Michael G Schwern wrote:
>
> >So I encourage folks to use "have" and "want" in the future. I'll
> >be using them in Test::Builder2.
>
> Good call. Change committed to pgtap and Test.Builder.
and PyTAP,
# from Andy Armstrong
# on Thursday 07 August 2008 12:49:
>> I would say it only appears if the tests failed. I would prefer
>> that to
>> take focus rather than needing to go activate it. Would you rather
>> scrollback to read the diagnostics in your terminal?
>
>Is that so odd? Emphatically
On 7 Aug 2008, at 19:43, Eric Wilhelm wrote:
Please don't take focus away from the window I'm working in. Please
don't cover up any of the many windows I've carefully arranged so
that
I can see everything I need.
I would say it only appears if the tests failed. I would prefer
that to
ta
# from David Cantrell
# on Thursday 07 August 2008 05:57:
>Please don't take focus away from the window I'm working in. Please
>don't cover up any of the many windows I've carefully arranged so that
> I can see everything I need.
I would say it only appears if the tests failed. I would prefer t
On Wed, Aug 06, 2008 at 08:17:09PM -0700, Eric Wilhelm wrote:
> I bet that would be prettier in a GUI. We all develop on teletypes, eh?
> Perhaps something involving TAP and diagnostics could be used to cause a
> graphical program to run (egads! a graphical program!) on your shiny
> widescreen
