2008/11/13 chromatic <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>:
> On Wednesday 12 November 2008 22:36:31 demerphq wrote:
>
>> > I really, really, really don't want PAUSE modifying my stuff after it's
>> > uploaded. Oh god the mysterious bugs. And then there's the fact that
>> > the code I've put my name and signature
On Wednesday 12 November 2008 22:36:31 demerphq wrote:
> > I really, really, really don't want PAUSE modifying my stuff after it's
> > uploaded. Oh god the mysterious bugs. And then there's the fact that
> > the code I've put my name and signature on is not the same code as is
> > being distribu
2008/11/13 Michael G Schwern <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>:
> Jonathan Rockway wrote:
>> * On Wed, Nov 12 2008, David Golden wrote:
>>> On Wed, Nov 12, 2008 at 3:17 PM, demerphq <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
IMO if the toolchain is to work this should happen at PAUSE (if it can
detect this problem IMO
Andreas J. Koenig wrote:
>> On Wed, 12 Nov 2008 19:13:40 -0800, Michael G Schwern <[EMAIL
>> PROTECTED]> said:
>
> > Now that the CPAN shells and archiving modules are handling it at their
> end, I
> > think the PAUSE filter should be removed. It's not PAUSE's job to be the
> code
David Golden wrote:
> On Wed, Nov 12, 2008 at 3:17 PM, demerphq <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>> I rather strongly object to this change.
>
> I totally understand -- but keep in mind that this was in response to
> someone flagging this as a potential (if highly unlikely) security
> hole, forwarding i
Jonathan Rockway wrote:
> * On Wed, Nov 12 2008, David Golden wrote:
>> On Wed, Nov 12, 2008 at 3:17 PM, demerphq <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>>> IMO if the toolchain is to work this should happen at PAUSE (if it can
>>> detect this problem IMO it should just damn well fix it itself) or at
>>> extra
* On Wed, Nov 12 2008, David Golden wrote:
> On Wed, Nov 12, 2008 at 3:17 PM, demerphq <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>> IMO if the toolchain is to work this should happen at PAUSE (if it can
>> detect this problem IMO it should just damn well fix it itself) or at
>> extraction.
>
> It *is* being fixed
2008/11/12 David Golden <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>:
> On Wed, Nov 12, 2008 at 3:17 PM, demerphq <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>> I rather strongly object to this change.
>
> I totally understand -- but keep in mind that this was in response to
> someone flagging this as a potential (if highly unlikely) secur
On Wed, Nov 12, 2008 at 3:17 PM, demerphq <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> I rather strongly object to this change.
I totally understand -- but keep in mind that this was in response to
someone flagging this as a potential (if highly unlikely) security
hole, forwarding it to some security-watchdog sit
2008/10/1 Andreas J. Koenig <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>:
>> On Tue, 30 Sep 2008 17:11:00 -0500, Jonathan Rockway <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
>> said:
>
> >> Anyway, I think the average CPAN author doesn't
> >> really know or care about that, sadly.
> >> See also
>
> > FWIW, this is true. I have never
10 matches
Mail list logo