On Feb 5, 2009, at 6:23 PM, Michael G Schwern wrote:
# Planning 2 more tests at foo.t line 3.
ok 1 - First test
not ok 2 - 2 tests were planned but only 1 was run
# Failed test "2 tests were planned but only 1 was run"
# at foo.t line 6.
# Planning 1 more test at foo.t line 6.
ok 3 - Seco
David E. Wheeler wrote:
> On Feb 5, 2009, at 12:34 PM, Michael G Schwern wrote:
>
>> Though we don't have incremental TAP plans, Test::Builder can check that
>> you've run all the tests you said you'd run before you add more. Thus...
>>
>> use Test::More;
>>
>> plan add => 2;
>> pass;
>>
>> p
On Feb 5, 2009, at 12:34 PM, Michael G Schwern wrote:
Though we don't have incremental TAP plans, Test::Builder can check
that
you've run all the tests you said you'd run before you add more.
Thus...
use Test::More;
plan add => 2;
pass;
plan add => 1;
pass; # failure
pass
David Cantrell wrote:
> On Thu, Feb 05, 2009 at 10:00:38AM +0200, Gabor Szabo wrote:
>
>> You might want to report error if both plan(2) and add_plan(2) was
>> called in the same file.
>
> Or you might not.
>
> plan(2);
> # generic tests
> ok(...);
> ok(...);
> if($ENV{RUN_REALLY_SLOW_TESTS}) {
Gabor Szabo wrote:
> BTW what about
>
> use Test::More;
> pass;
> pass;
> # done_testing() # not being called at all.
>
> Is this a failure now as there was no plan, not even a no_plan ?
It's a failure by virtue of there being no TAP plan. I didn't feel it was
necessary to output an explicit fa
On Thu, Feb 05, 2009 at 10:00:38AM +0200, Gabor Szabo wrote:
> You might want to report error if both plan(2) and add_plan(2) was
> called in the same file.
Or you might not.
plan(2);
# generic tests
ok(...);
ok(...);
if($ENV{RUN_REALLY_SLOW_TESTS}) {
add_plan(2);
ok(...);
ok(...);
}
done_
- Original Message
> From: Gaurav Vaidya
> I just made a branch of Test::Builder which does this. You can see the
> expected
> behaviour in the tests at:
>
> http://github.com/gaurav/test-more/tree/incremental-planning/t/incremental_planning/
> (or http://tinyurl.com/ad8mb4)
On Wed, Feb 4, 2009 at 4:35 PM, Ovid wrote:
> - Original Message
>
>> From: Michael G Schwern
>
> First of all, thank you! This is fantastic work and I'm sure it will make a
> lot of people happy.
++
> Thoughts on first order support:
>
> use Test::More;
>
> plan(3);
> pass;
> pass;
