David E. Wheeler wrote:
> On Feb 21, 2009, at 5:44 PM, Michael G Schwern wrote:
>
>>> Yeah, I'm suggesting this more for a new version of TAP.
>>
>> It won't work because it's not backwards compatible.
>
> I care less and less about backwards compatibility every day. Also,
> chromatic.
There is
On Feb 21, 2009, at 5:44 PM, Michael G Schwern wrote:
Yeah, I'm suggesting this more for a new version of TAP.
It won't work because it's not backwards compatible.
I care less and less about backwards compatibility every day. Also,
chromatic.
Technically "ok 1.1" should be read as an unn
David E. Wheeler wrote:
> On Feb 21, 2009, at 11:35 AM, Michael G Schwern wrote:
>
>> David E. Wheeler wrote:
>>> Dot notation?
>>>
>>> ok 1.1
>>> ok 1.2
>>> ok 2.1
>>> 1..2
>>
>> If you don't want any existing TAP parser to be able to read it and delay
>> release until they do, sure!
>>
>> I am t
On Feb 21, 2009, at 11:35 AM, Michael G Schwern wrote:
David E. Wheeler wrote:
Dot notation?
ok 1.1
ok 1.2
ok 2.1
1..2
If you don't want any existing TAP parser to be able to read it and
delay
release until they do, sure!
I am totally not waiting for TAP to work out sub-plan syntax.
Ye
David E. Wheeler wrote:
> Dot notation?
>
> ok 1.1
> ok 1.2
> ok 2.1
> 1..2
If you don't want any existing TAP parser to be able to read it and delay
release until they do, sure!
I am totally not waiting for TAP to work out sub-plan syntax.
--
185. My name is not a killing word.
-- Th
On Sat, Feb 21, 2009 at 5:24 AM, Gabor Szabo wrote:
>>> I wonder if there are modules out there that already do this?
>>> I could not find any that would fit my needs.
Test::Cmd? It's not built on Test::Builder but could be
adapted/wrapped. It uses shell redirection to capture output, which
sho
Aristotle Pagaltzis wrote:
> * Michael G Schwern [2009-02-20 23:35]:
>> And we come back to the beginning: it's all going to be ad hoc
>> anyway until TAP formalizes it. Fine for eyeballing. If someone
>> wants to scrape the information out they can do it from the
>> description (with the usual ca
On Fri, Feb 20, 2009 at 11:30 PM, David E. Wheeler wrote:
> On Feb 20, 2009, at 1:23 PM, Gabor Szabo wrote:
>
>> I wonder if there are modules out there that already do this?
>> I could not find any that would fit my needs.
>
> Test::Output?
>
> http://search.cpan.org/perldoc?Test::Output
>
> If