On Feb 22, 2009, at 3:45 PM, Michael G Schwern wrote:
I think that second one has value.
Agreed, but that's what a deprecation cycle is for.
TAP currently has no deprecation cycle. That's what I introduced
earlier.
http://www.ietf.org/mail-archive/web/tap/current/msg00411.html
Good!
D
David E. Wheeler wrote:
> On Feb 21, 2009, at 10:54 PM, Michael G Schwern wrote:
>
>> There is Perl 5 style backwards compatibility where you never, ever break
>> anything for years and years and years and even for code that you're
>> not sure
>> even exists. That's what chromatic is on about.
>>
On Feb 21, 2009, at 10:54 PM, Michael G Schwern wrote:
There is Perl 5 style backwards compatibility where you never, ever
break
anything for years and years and years and even for code that you're
not sure
even exists. That's what chromatic is on about.
And then there's backwards compatib
