On Feb 23, 2009, at 1:39 AM, Aristotle Pagaltzis wrote:
Or differently, to RSS?
It may well be that we’ll need to break backcompat over this
issue, and if so, OK, but “I don’t care about backcompat” is
no way to go about designing a format that succeeds widely.
Hence my suggestion for a depre
On Mon, Feb 23, 2009 at 07:10:09AM -0500, David Golden wrote:
> (Apologies to those receiving this multiple times)
>
> Eric Wilhelm and I have put out Module::Build 0.31_04 as a release
> candidate for a stable 0.32 Module::Build.
>
> Initial CPAN Testers results look good. (So far, it's the fir
(Apologies to those receiving this multiple times)
Eric Wilhelm and I have put out Module::Build 0.31_04 as a release
candidate for a stable 0.32 Module::Build.
Initial CPAN Testers results look good. (So far, it's the first "all
PASS" since 0.2804)
However, before release (and before it gets p
* David E. Wheeler [2009-02-22 07:20]:
> I care less and less about backwards compatibility every day.
This is a format spec, not code.
Guess what happened to XML 1.1? To XHTML2?
Or differently, to RSS?
It may well be that we’ll need to break backcompat over this
issue, and if so, OK, but “I d
