On 29 Mar 2009, at 17:34, Yanick Champoux wrote:
Ovid wrote:
Just to let folks know, at the Perl-QA Hackathon, I've implemented
nested TAP in Test::Builder.
Ooooh This calls for a spontaneous dance of joy!
A few months ago, I hacked Test::Class so that it uses Test::Group
to
Ovid wrote:
Just to let folks know, at the Perl-QA Hackathon, I've implemented nested TAP
in Test::Builder.
Ooooh This calls for a spontaneous dance of joy!
A few months ago, I hacked Test::Class so that it uses Test::Group to
aggregate the subtests of each test. Changing the
Evgeny wrote:
> Super! Well done!
>
> Makes me feel all warm inside.
>
> Would kiss you if you were near here somewhere! :)
I'm kind of glad I'm not, but thank you all the same.
--
24. Must not tell any officer that I am smarter than they are, especially
if it's true.
-- The 213 Thing
I just released a new module to CPAN to take care of a pretty common use case
when using Module::Build: run my tests but give me a TAP Archive.
perl Build.PL && ./Build test_archive
perl Build.PL && ./Build test_archive --archive_file mytests.tar.gz
--
Michael Peters
Plus Three, LP
Super! Well done!
Makes me feel all warm inside.
Would kiss you if you were near here somewhere! :)
-
evgeny
On Sun, Mar 29, 2009 at 12:52 PM, Michael G Schwern wrote:
> Just pushed out a new alpha of Test::More. There's a bunch of new features
> having to do with the plan. In general it's l
Michael Peters wrote:
So, if you're already cutting it into individual TAP streams why don't
you just use a real archive? I can add the feature to just dump the
archived files into a directory and not tar.gz it if that makes it
easier. I know it's not a pipe interface, but it's not radically
Just to let folks know, at the Perl-QA Hackathon, I've implemented nested TAP
in Test::Builder. Andy Armstrong is working on the Test::Harness side. It's
completely backwards compatible and works with the current Test::Harness, but
we're trying to expose more information via the harness.
Thi
Steffen Schwigon wrote:
> 1. I have collections of TAP with YAML but missing "TAP version 13"
>prefixes, which influences the yaml recognition.
>
>Can I tell TAP::Parser to assume a particular version (ie., 13)?
>
>Else I need to prepend it by myself, this would at least work on my
>
Just pushed out a new alpha of Test::More. There's a bunch of new features
having to do with the plan. In general it's less restrictive, you can now run
tests without first having declared a plan.
This enables the long called for new feature of done_testing(). It's a safer
replacement for no_pl
On 26 Mar 2009, at 18:39, chromatic wrote:
On Thursday 26 March 2009 11:27:13 Michael G Schwern wrote:
If I was to come up with a good argument as to why not to run the
tests in
production that would be it. The possibility of screwing up the
production
data is too great.
That's the onl
10 matches
Mail list logo
