Re: [ANNOUNCE] Test::More/Builder 0.89_01 now with subtests

2009-06-23 Thread David E. Wheeler
On Jun 23, 2009, at 2:22 PM, Paul Johnson wrote: One question though. Why subtest "text", sub {}; rather than subtest {}, "text"; ? The latter seems more consistent as well as removing a rather annoying bit of syntax. Were you worried that "text" might get lost at the end of the

Re: [ANNOUNCE] Test::More/Builder 0.89_01 now with subtests

2009-06-23 Thread Paul Johnson
On Tue, Jun 23, 2009 at 04:07:55PM -0400, Michael G Schwern wrote: > Small change log, big feature. This version adds subtest(), implemented by > Ovid. This allows you to run a bunch of tests with their own plan. > > use Test::More tests => 3; > > pass("First test");

[ANNOUNCE] Test::More/Builder 0.89_01 now with subtests

2009-06-23 Thread Michael G Schwern
This is an alpha release of Test::More available on CPAN and from its repository. http://github.com/schwern/test-more/tree/v0.89_01 subtest() - Small change log, big feature. This version adds subtest(), implemented by Ovid. This allows you to run a bunch of tests with their own plan.