Michael G Schwern schrieb am 18.11.2011 um 20:24 (-0800):
> The idea would be to continue to ship a copy of
> Mouse::Tiny as TB2::Mouse, that takes care of the
> dependency loop, but to only use it if a good enough
> version of Mouse is not already installed.
>
> To mitigate risk of a new version
# from Michael Ludwig
# on Saturday 26 November 2011 11:34:
>I don't understand the concern for unauthorised use. How would
>it be different from relying on any other implementation detail?
>In spirit, it's like relying on internal JDK classes.
Java users don't complain loudly enough to be awarde
Gabor Szabo schrieb am 26.11.2011 um 10:44 (+0200):
> On Sat, Nov 26, 2011 at 9:58 AM, Ovid
> wrote:
> > Rename TB2::Mouse to something like
> > TB2::_U_R_A_MORON_FOR_USING_THIS_ and I
> > think the problem will take care of itself.
> I can just imagine what people outside of the Perl community
On Saturday, November 26, 2011 at 12:44 AM, Gabor Szabo wrote:
> I can just imagine what people outside of the Perl community
> will say when they see such code in the official distribution of Perl.
The same things they already do?
-- c
On Sat, Nov 26, 2011 at 9:58 AM, Ovid wrote:
>> From: Michael G Schwern
>
>
>>Let's keep our heads. The whole argument against TB2::Mouse is predicated on
>>the idea that shipping TB2::Mouse in the core MIGHT cause future maintenance
>>hassle for p5p. If the alternatives will cause EVEN MORE ma
