Re: TAP::Harness and -w

2013-07-04 Thread Ricardo Signes
* Eric Wilhelm [2013-07-04T17:33:45] > # from Leon Timmermans on Thursday 04 July 2013: > >> ewilhelm : We should keep the original change, but update EUMM to > >>restore -w > > > >I'm not sure that's what he meant. > > Yeah no. I said get rid of Test::Harness. > > TAP::Harness provides a cle

Re: TAP::Harness and -w

2013-07-04 Thread Eric Wilhelm
# from Leon Timmermans on Thursday 04 July 2013: >> ewilhelm : We should keep the original change, but update EUMM to >>restore -w > >I'm not sure that's what he meant. Yeah no. I said get rid of Test::Harness. TAP::Harness provides a cleaner interface and this default only exist in the old c

Re: TAP::Harness and -w

2013-07-04 Thread Ricardo Signes
* Leon Timmermans [2013-07-04T14:04:21] > By what process? Define consensus? Given Andy is the official > maintainer and Ovid is the effective maintainer, I don't think they > need our consensus a priori. 06perms.txt says: Test::Harness,ANDYA,m Test::Harness,MSCHWERN,c Test::Harness,OVID,c

Re: TAP::Harness and -w

2013-07-04 Thread Leon Timmermans
On Tue, Jul 2, 2013 at 8:51 PM, Ricardo Signes wrote: > > I just submitted: > > https://github.com/Perl-Toolchain-Gang/Test-Harness/pull/16 > > ...to document two undocumented changes. First, the removal of "turn on -w by > default with no easy way to turn it off" and secondly the reversion of