Re: TAP::Harness and -w

# from Leon Timmermans on Tuesday 17 September 2013: >odds are no one ... looked at that wikipage ... >IMO, it's the wrong medium. I agree. Also, Test::Harness is the wrong module for this discussion. # from chromatic on Tuesday 17 September 2013: >Pro of adding -w to test runs: >- that'

Re: TAP::Harness and -w

On Tue, Sep 17, 2013 at 7:13 PM, Mark Stosberg wrote: > I think a pro/con list is a reasonable request. I've read all the > messages myself, am a regular user of Perl's testing tools, and the > benefits and drawbacks are not clear to me either. > > An attempting-to-be-neutral summary would be ver

Re: TAP::Harness and -w

On 09/17/2013 01:20 PM, chromatic wrote: > On Tuesday, September 17, 2013 01:13:26 PM Mark Stosberg wrote: > >> An attempting-to-be-neutral summary would be very helpful. > > Pro of adding -w to test runs: > - that's how Test::Harness has always worked, and people might be > relying > on

Re: Re: TAP::Harness and -w

On Tuesday, September 17, 2013 01:13:26 PM Mark Stosberg wrote: > An attempting-to-be-neutral summary would be very helpful. Pro of adding -w to test runs: - that's how Test::Harness has always worked, and people might be relying on that behavior Cons of adding -w to test runs:

Re: TAP::Harness and -w

On 09/17/2013 11:26 AM, Leon Timmermans wrote: > On Sun, Jul 7, 2013 at 11:45 AM, Ovid > wrote: > > I'm winding up with astonishingly little bandwidth due to launching > our company, so I was hoping to see a strong consensus from the > users. I would

Re: TAP::Harness and -w

On Sun, Jul 7, 2013 at 11:45 AM, Ovid wrote: > I'm winding up with astonishingly little bandwidth due to launching our > company, so I was hoping to see a strong consensus from the users. I would > also love to see examples of where the change or lack thereof is causing an > issue. I am SWAMPED w