On 04/16/2017 09:46 PM, Ricardo Signes wrote:
* James E Keenan [2017-04-12T22:15:22]
For me the most interesting aspect of this fifth round is that 29
distributions which appeared in order-of-battle-20170409.txt (the
previous round focusing on no-dot) no longer appear in
order-of-battle-2017041
* James E Keenan [2017-04-12T22:15:22]
> For me the most interesting aspect of this fifth round is that 29
> distributions which appeared in order-of-battle-20170409.txt (the
> previous round focusing on no-dot) no longer appear in
> order-of-battle-20170412.txt. That is, their no-dot problems --